| Editorial Notes | p. xiii |
| Introduction | p. xv |
| Foreword | p. 3 |
| The Fittingness of the Incarnation | |
| Was it fitting for God to become incarnate? | p. 5 |
| Was the incarnation of the Word of God necessary for the restoration of the human race? | p. 9 |
| If man had not sinned, would God nevertheless have become incarnate? | p. 15 |
| Did God become incarnate more to remedy actual sins than original sin? | p. 21 |
| Would it have been fitting for God to become incarnate from the beginning of the human race? | p. 25 |
| Should the work of the Incarnation have been postponed until the end of the world? | p. 29 |
| The Kind of Union the Incarnation is in Itself | |
| Was the union of the incarnate Word in one nature? | p. 35 |
| Was it in a person? | p. 41 |
| Was it in a supposit or hypostasis? | p. 47 |
| Whether the person of Christ is composite | p. 53 |
| Was there a union of body and soul in Christ? | p. 55 |
| Was human nature united to the Word in the manner of an accident? | p. 59 |
| Is the union of the divine and human nature something created? | p. 67 |
| Is this union the same as assumption? | p. 69 |
| Is the union of the two natures the greatest of all unions? | p. 73 |
| Was the union of the two natures in Christ wrought through grace? | p. 75 |
| Did any merits precede this union? | p. 79 |
| Was the grace of union natural to the man Christ? | p. 83 |
| The Mode of Union on the Part of the Person Assuming | |
| Is it fitting that a divine person assume? | p. 87 |
| And for the divine nature to assume? | p. 89 |
| Personality aside, can the divine nature assume? | p. 93 |
| Can one person without another assume a created nature? | p. 95 |
| Does each person have the power to assume? | p. 99 |
| Can many persons assume a nature one and the same numerically? | p. 101 |
| Can one person assume two natures numerically distinct? | p. 105 |
| Was it more fitting that the Son of God rather than another divine person assume a human nature? | p. 109 |
| The Union on the Part of the Nature Assumed | |
| Was human nature more capable of being assumed than any other nature? | p. 115 |
| Did the Son of God assume a person? | p. 121 |
| Did the divine person assume a man? | p. 123 |
| Should the Son of God have assumed a human nature separated from all individuals? | p. 125 |
| Should the Son of God have assumed human nature in all individuals? | p. 129 |
| Should the Son of God have assumed a human nature from the stock of Adam? | p. 131 |
| The Assumption of the Parts of Human Nature | |
| Did the Son of God assume a true body? | p. 135 |
| Did Christ have a carnal or earthly body? | p. 139 |
| Did the Son of God assume a soul? | p. 143 |
| Did the Son of God assume a human mind or intellect? | p. 147 |
| The Order of Assumption | |
| Whether the Son of God assumed flesh through the soul | p. 153 |
| Did the Son of God assume a soul through the mind? | p. 157 |
| Was the soul of Christ assumed by the Word prior to the body? | p. 159 |
| Was the flesh assumed by the Word prior to its union with the soul? | p. 163 |
| Did the Son of God assume a whole human nature through its parts? | p. 167 |
| Was the Son's taking up human nature through grace? | p. 169 |
| Appendices | |
| The Setting of the Treatise | p. 175 |
| Technical Terminology | p. 178 |
| Glossary | p. 180 |
| Index | p. 185 |
| Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved. |