Structuring Poverty in the Windy City

"[An] engaging and ambitiously researched contribution to urban history, public policy, and legal studies."—Journal of Interdisciplinary History

"Structuring Poverty in the Windy City is a very important contribution to our knowledge of American, urban, and Chicago history at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries with the socially contested development of poverty law. Chicago and the United States more generally sought to control poverty by defining the autonomy which paid work conveyed; the virtue of women who were wives, housewives, and mothers; and the isolation of the growing African American population. It tried to regulate, if not eliminate, various forms of poverty under a theory developed by social scientists, journalists and public officials. This book should be read by those who care about Chicago history, urban history, and American history but also those who want to understand the development of law, public administration, and public policy."—Dick Simpson, coauthor of Winning Elections in the 21st Century

"Protests in Ferguson and other cities exposed the ways police and courts have created modern debtors' prisons that often punish people for being poor and being black. In an impressively researched volume, Joel Black traces the origins of similar structures of state power in Chicago from the time of the Great Fire (1871) to Roosevelt's New Deal. Ideas about poverty, gender, and race legitimated state control over people's lives that undermined autonomy and personal responsibility. Structuring Poverty in the Windy City is a cautionary tale for our time."—Todd Swanstrom, coauthor of Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-First Century, Third Edition, Revised

"Joel Black has dug deep into Chicago's post-fire archives to reveal how structures of poverty were constituted in law, social policy, and the moral opprobrium of erstwhile reformers. This is the story of people who got caught up in those structures and the class, racial, and gendered hierarchies they reinforced. But it is also the story of how people fought back to challenge and undermine institutionalized practices of punishment and blame, in ways that remain as instructive and relevant today as they were a century ago."—Alice O'Connor, professor of history, University of California, Santa Barbara