Scroungers, sponges, leeches. These are just are some of the terms that are now used to describe the most vulnerable in our society, whether they are sick, disabled, or unemployed. Even the programs they draw from are often called "entitlements," linking social assistance to something seen as self-serving. People who depend on welfare programs have long been a popular scapegoat for all manner of social ills, but in recent years hostility towards them has reached new levels of hysteria, with the "undeserving poor" blamed for everything from crime to rising levels of child abuse.
While some of the press has played its role in fueling this hysteria, the proliferation of social media has added a disturbing new dimension to this process. Debunked posts about food stamp use or inner-city violence spread unabated and reinforce scare stories while normalizing the perception of poverty as a form of deviancy. In this provocative and illuminating new book, journalist and researcher James Morrison explores and analyzes the ways in which the poor are portrayed both in print and online, and how it affects the beliefs of those who consume this media. He also puts these attitudes into a wider context showing how they can lead to a breakdown in social trust and community cohesion and further hurt the very people who need the most help.
Industry Reviews
Scroungers makes many salient and persuasive arguments, most notably regarding the incompatibility between the abstract fetishisation of work and the grim reality of neoliberal Britain. * Guardian *
In his new book Scroungers (Zed), James Morrison ... explores and analyses the way in which the poor are portrayed in print and online. * New Humanist *
Scroungers makes many salient and persuasive arguments, most notably regarding the incompatibility between the abstract fetishisation of work and the grim reality of neoliberal Britain. * Guardian *
Unmasks the motives and mechanisms behind anti-welfare discourses through a forensic analysis of ideological ploys by right-wing politicians, wilfully distorted narratives in traditional media and vitriolic outpourings in social media. A highly original contribution to the sociology of hate. * Charles Critcher, Swansea University *
Meticulously revisits and dissects press and TV misrepresentation of so-called "shirkers". The book is ultimately optimistic, appearing at a time when many are now questioning the neo-liberal consensus that has sustained these anti-welfare narratives. * Dominic Wring, Loughborough University *
If there was any doubt that scroungerphobia was accidental, Morrison shows us the opposite - it is a carefully constructed and dangerous discourse attached to the "undeserving" in society. This book provides an essential counter-narrative to this hysteria. * Kayleigh Garthwaite, University of Birmingham *
Morrison examines how the press helped to prepare public opinion for the government's unprecedented attack on Britain's welfare state. A robust and important contribution to the debate on how the media shapes attitudes towards the poor. * Mike Berry, Cardiff University *
The demonising of the poor has long been at the core of British social policy. Morrison's important study brings this story into the digital age, and is essential to understanding the role of the media in sustaining this brutal rhetoric. * Peter Golding, Northumbria University (Emeritus) *
From "scroungerphobia" to "shirkophobia", Morrison throws a penetrating light on the politics of the pernicious demonization and othering of social security claimants in the social media age. * Ruth Lister, Loughborough University (Emeritus) *