Get Free Shipping on orders over $79
Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech - Reinaldo Elugardo

Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech

By: Reinaldo Elugardo, ?Robert J. Stainton

eText | 26 August 2005 | Edition Number 1

At a Glance

eText


$159.01

or 4 interest-free payments of $39.75 with

 or 

Instant online reading in your Booktopia eTextbook Library *

Why choose an eTextbook?

Instant Access *

Purchase and read your book immediately

Read Aloud

Listen and follow along as Bookshelf reads to you

Study Tools

Built-in study tools like highlights and more

* eTextbooks are not downloadable to your eReader or an app and can be accessed via web browsers only. You must be connected to the internet and have no technical issues with your device or browser that could prevent the eTextbook from operating.
The papers in this volume address two main topics: Q1: What is the nature, and especially the scope, of ellipsis in natural l- guage? Q2: What are the linguistic/philosophical implications of what one takes the nature/scope of ellipsis to be? As will emerge below, each of these main topics includes a large sub-part that deals speci?cally with nonsentential speech. Within the ?rst main topic, Q1, there arises the sub-issueofwhethernonsententialspeechfallswithinthescopeofellipsisornot;within the second main topic, Q2, there arises the sub-issue of what linguistic/philosophical implications follow, if nonsentential speech does/does not count as ellipsis. I. THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF ELLIPSIS A. General Issue: How Many Natural Kinds? There are many things to which the label 'ellipsis' can be readily applied. But it's quite unclear whether all of them belong in a single natural kind. To explain, consider a view, assumed in Stainton (2000), Stainton (2004a), and elsewhere. It is the view that there are fundamentally (at least) three very different things that readily get called 'ellipsis', each belonging to a distinct kind. First, there is the very broad phenomenon of a speaker omitting information which the hearer is expected to make use of in interpreting an utterance. Included therein, possibly as a special case, is the use of an abbreviated form of speech, when one could have used a more explicit expression. (See Neale (2000) and Sellars (1954) for more on this idea.
on
Desktop
Tablet
Mobile

More in Linguistics

The Miracle of Language - Richard Lederer

eBOOK

Burn This Book : Notes on Literature and Engagement - Toni Morrison

eBOOK

How to Write a Sentence : And How to Read One - Stanley Fish

eBOOK

Dictionary of American Slang - Barbara Ann Kipfer

eBOOK

RRP $21.99

$17.99

18%
OFF
The Writing of Fiction - Edith Wharton

eBOOK