Art and Analysis

'Adrian Stokes' writing is the only criticism today that casts an imaginative spell like art ... He recaptures as much as writing ever has of the actual reverberations of art on one's life.'- Lawrence Gowing, painter, and editor of Critical Writings of Adrian Stokes'If Stokes' early work can be read much as though it belonged to the tradition of nineteenth-century aestheticism, it is to be observed that, throughout, there is a place reserved for psychoanalytic theory, at which it can be introduced when the moment is right.'- Richard Wollheim, philosopher of aesthetics, and editor of The Image in Form: Selected Writings of Adrian Stokes'Adrian Stokes built a bridge between art and psychoanalysis that will stand for generations ... When he embraced psychoanalysis, and the developments of Melanie Klein's thinking, in particular, he did so because the theories seemed to him to throw an unparalleled light on the phenomenology of art as what Wittgenstein has called "a form of life" ... He sought the mysterious powers of art in its basic references to bodily experience and object relations, to visual configurations, tactile sensations, to the geography of life space, and to the haunting quality of repetition of patterns, the "incantatory" element, as he called it.'- Donald Meltzer, psychoanalyst'Stokes believed that the contemplation of art, even more than the contemplation of landscape, could bring the spectator to an intuitive understanding of how the often inchoate self might identify with those internal figures that psychoanalysts call "good objects". Works of art, he maintained, derive many of their attributes from the ability of both artist and spectator to commune with such objects. Neither work of art nor good object coerce; they invite. They envelop us while at the same time remaining other.'Eric Rhode, psychotherapist and author; editor of A Game that Must be Lost: Collected Papers of Adrian Stokes