Ultimate Ambiguities

"At the theoretical level, the volume certainly makes a strong argument for the enduring relevance of the sociological tradition from Durkheim to Turner. Robben's article alone presents a most poignant illustration of the analytic power of liminality in a contemporary setting. Berger's valiant argument for Durkheim's much maligned concept of effervescence should be taken seriously, for it seems to open a rapprochement between structural and cognitive science approaches to ritual." ⢠Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

"Ultimate Ambiguities: Investing Death and Liminality is a valuable contribution to the often diffuse literature on religion and death/dying given that the widely varying case studies share a common focus on 'liminality explicitly in the context of death'. Editors Peter Berger and Justin Kroesen draw together a wide-ranging set of eleven primarily anthropological chapters. These offer rich and contextualized examples of beliefs, especially ritualization, from various traditions. Yet the key measure of this book's success is theoretical, given its explicit focus on liminality... The book is a valuable resource... the editors deserve praise for putting together one of the most focused and valuable volumes in the death and dying sub-genre." ⢠Reading Religion

"With studies ranging from the Sora of India to death rituals in Ancient Greece, this selection offers a comparative approach that reinforces previous theories while also challenging liminality as some unidentifiable location... Berger and Kroesen's compilation is a most valuable addition to studies on liminality and death as it introduces key theoretical concepts through varied and intriguing case studies." ⢠Religious Studies Review

"This is a hugely interesting book that will be a very valuable contribution to the study of death in social science and the humanities." ⢠Arnar rnason, University of Aberdeen

"This is an important volume dealing... with the always-complex ritualization of death in comparative perspective, critically reassessing the work of some of the classic authors in the social sciences and more particularly in anthropological debates, and offering new theoretical and empirical angles to better understand the ambiguities inherent to death, burial, and afterlife beliefs." ⢠Francisco Ferr¡ndiz, Spanish National Research Council