Get Free Shipping on orders over $89
Settled Versus Right : A Theory of Precedent - Randy J. Kozel
eTextbook alternate format product

Instant online reading.
Don't wait for delivery!

Settled Versus Right

A Theory of Precedent

By: Randy J. Kozel

Paperback | 15 June 2017

At a Glance

Paperback


RRP $63.95

$61.75

or 4 interest-free payments of $15.44 with

 or 

Ships in 5 to 7 business days

In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. The problem with the US Supreme Court's approach to precedent is not that the Justices are behaving in an unprincipled manner. The problem is that the modern doctrine of precedent is undermined by principled disagreements among Justices acting in good faith. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the role of the Supreme Court and the trajectory of constitutional law.
Industry Reviews
'Precedent is one of law's eternal problems. One might think there is nothing else to say. One would be wrong, as Randy J. Kozel proves with this clear, cogent, and interesting new framing of the problems and a plausible, intelligent approach to a solution.' Adrian Vermeule, Ralph S. Tyler Professor of Constitutional Law, Harvard Law School
'Randy J. Kozel argues that judges should subordinate their individual views and embrace a common project of legal development. In Settled Versus Right, he puts precedent back at the center of constitutional theory.' Jack M. Balkin, Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment, Yale Law School
'Kozel's defense of the practice of precedent is comprehensive, persuasive, imaginative, and unremittingly fair-minded in its treatment of opposing positions. Although the book focuses on stare decisis in the Supreme Court of the United States, its analysis will be illuminating for everyone interested in understanding the nature of common law reasoning, both in the United States and elsewhere.' Frederick Schauer, David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Virginia
'The book thoroughly describes a controversy that has long occupied legal scholars.' P. Lermack, CHOICE

More in Constitutional & Administrative Law

Australian Public Law : 4th Edition - Gabrielle Appleby

RRP $152.95

$120.75

21%
OFF
Against Legal Punishment : An Argument for Abolition - Nathan Hanna

RRP $305.00

$263.75

14%
OFF
European Company Law - Nicola  de Luca

RRP $239.95

$231.75

European Company Law - Nicola  de Luca

RRP $96.95

$96.75

One Nation Under Law : The Meaning of the Declaration of Independence - Carlton F. W.  Larson
The Constitution of 1789 : A New Introduction - Ilan Wurman
The Constitution of 1789 : A New Introduction - Ilan Wurman
Federal Constitutional Law : 6th Edition - A Contemporary View - Melissa Castan