There is no more gruesome and tragic record in the history of the 20th century than the photographs taken at the liberation of the concentration camps in Germany after World War II. These images are seared into our collective memory as brutal evidence of the atrocity of war and the evil of which humanity is capable. But the horrific content of these images has somewhat obscured their status as historical documents. This text reveals the unique significance of the concentration camp photographs - how they have become the basis of our memory of the Holocaust and how they have affected our presentations and perceptions of contemporary history's subsequent atrocities. Prior to the Holocaust, news reporters primarily told their stories in words, using photographs almost as an afterthought. When the camps were liberated, however, journalists and reporters turned to photography to bear witness to the unspeakable and indescribable scenes of the dead and dying. Through this process, the text argues, photographs earned a new legitimacy as tools of reporting.
The author shows how, since the end of the war, the use of "atrocity photos" has fallen into patterns - or waves of memory - determined by the different roles that the photos occupy in the public imagination. Most recently, for example, the images from Bosnia hark back to the Holocaust imagery, an echo that can actually dilute our response to what happened both then and now.
Industry Reviews
Media critic Zelizer, a columnist for the Nation who teaches at the Annenberg School of Communications at the Univ. of Pennsylvania, studies the effect of atrocity photos, paying particular attention to those taken at the liberation of Nazi concentration camps in WWII. Like so many writers on photography, Zelizer adopts as her starting point a line from Walter Benjamin: "Every image of the past that is recognized by the present as one of its own concerns threatens to disappear irretrievably." According to her, the liberation photographs have become paradigmatic for the ways in which atrocities are depicted in the news media; they function as a series of markers for collective memory of the Holocaust and project that reality forward onto more recent acts of barbarism. At the same time, the Holocaust photos served to establish the photograph as the seemingly irrefutable documentation of an otherwise unimaginably horrible fact. Zelizer traces the historical status of reporting on the Holocaust from before the liberation through the present to illustrate the way in which the status of photojournalism was significantly improved by the later events. (The word "photojournalism" was not even coined until 1942.) She follows the trajectory of post-Holocaust collective memory from the flood of images in the immediate aftermath of the war through nearly three decades of silence until the late 1970s, when the Holocaust once more became a central part of sociopolitical discourse. Finally, she analyzes the ways in which contemporary reporting attempts to reproduce the effects of reporting on the Holocaust. Her final conclusion is a damning one, that the use of such agonizing images merely allows for "atrocity's normalization." Moreover, "we may remember earlier atrocities so as to forget the contemporary ones." Regrettably, she couches her findings in a dry academic style that makes for tedious reading. The overall effect of the volume is enervation. An important topic still in search of the right analyst. (Kirkus Reviews)