| List of Figures | p. x |
| List of Tables | p. xiv |
| List of Abbreviations | p. xvii |
| Acknowledgements | p. xix |
| Introduction | p. 1 |
| Preposition placement: The need for corroborating evidence | p. 1 |
| World Englishes, usage-based linguistics and preposition placement | p. 3 |
| Outline | p. 7 |
| Corroborating evidence: Data and methodology | p. 9 |
| 'What counts as evidence in Linguistics' | p. 9 |
| Exhibit A: Corpus data | p. 14 |
| The International Corpus of English (ICE) corpora | p. 15 |
| ICE-GB | p. 15 |
| ICE-EA | p. 17 |
| Forensic tools I: Goldvarb, R, Coll.analysis 3 and HCFA | p. 18 |
| Exhibit B: Introspection data | p. 26 |
| Experiment design | p. 26 |
| Methodology: Magnitude Estimation | p. 28 |
| Forensic tools II: SPSS | p. 32 |
| Case notes: Independent factors | p. 35 |
| Construction-specific constraints | p. 35 |
| Relative clauses | p. 36 |
| Type of displaced element | p. 40 |
| Beyond bound relative clauses | p. 40 |
| Bound relative clauses: Secondary effects | p. 47 |
| Different variable effects across clause types | p. 51 |
| Diachronic and typological evidence | p. 56 |
| Type of PP | p. 65 |
| PP complements vs PP adjuncts | p. 65 |
| Types of PPs: The complement-adjunct cline | p. 66 |
| Idiosyncratic lexical effects | p. 72 |
| Obligatorily pied-piped prepositions | p. 72 |
| Obligatorily stranded prepositions | p. 74 |
| Antecedents which induce obligatory pied-piping | p. 75 |
| Level of formality | p. 76 |
| PPs embedded in NPs and AdjPs | p. 84 |
| Complexity | p. 93 |
| Gries's multivariate corpus study (2002) | p. 94 |
| Complexity-related and -specific factors | p. 96 |
| Second-language effects: Kenyan English | p. 98 |
| L2 language learning | p. 99 |
| General properties of L2 preposition placement | p. 101 |
| English in Kenya: Focus on preposition placement | p. 104 |
| Evidence I: Corpus results | p. 113 |
| Coding decisions | p. 113 |
| Categorical clause contexts | p. 120 |
| ICE-GB results | p. 120 |
| ICE-EA results | p. 125 |
| HCFA: ICE-GB vs ICE-EA | p. 129 |
| Variable clause contexts: ICE-GB vs ICE-EA | p. 133 |
| Tokens displaying no variation | p. 133 |
| Non-standard ICE-EA tokens | p. 133 |
| Accidental and systematic gaps I | p. 134 |
| Idiosyncratic effects: Obligatorily stranded prepositions and the effect of to be | p. 137 |
| Categorical PP types: Accidental and systematic gaps II | p. 141 |
| Obligatory pied-piping PP types | p. 146 |
| Logistic regression analysis | p. 147 |
| Relative clauses | p. 157 |
| Non-finite relative clauses | p. 158 |
| Categorically pied-piping PPs | p. 160 |
| Logistic regression analysis | p. 165 |
| HCFA: Stranded finite relative clauses | p. 170 |
| Summary | p. 172 |
| Evidence II: Experimental results | p. 175 |
| Preposition placement in simple relative clauses | p. 175 |
| British English | p. 177 |
| Kenyan English | p. 183 |
| Preposition placement in relative clauses of varying complexity | p. 188 |
| British English | p. 192 |
| Kenyan English | p. 203 |
| Preposition placement in interrogative clauses | p. 212 |
| British English | p. 214 |
| Kenyan English | p. 219 |
| Summary | p. 224 |
| Preposition placement: The case for a Construction Grammar account | p. 226 |
| Construction Grammar: A descriptively and explanatorily adequate linguistic theory | p. 226 |
| Preposition placement: The minimum complete-inheritance construction network | p. 236 |
| Variable preposition placement | p. 241 |
| English relative clauses and Construction Grammar | p. 247 |
| Categorically stranding contexts | p. 257 |
| Preposition placement: The enriched usage-based construction network | p. 264 |
| Conclusion: The verdict | p. 276 |
| Online appendix | p. 279 |
| References | p. 280 |
| Index | p. 295 |
| Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved. |