| Computational Methods for Protein Structure Prediction and Fold Recognition | p. 1 |
| Primary Structure Analysis | p. 1 |
| Database Searches | p. 1 |
| Protein Domain Identification | p. 3 |
| Prediction of Disordered Regions | p. 5 |
| Secondary Structure Prediction | p. 5 |
| Helices and Strands and Otherwise | p. 5 |
| Transmembrane Helices | p. 8 |
| Protein Fold Recognition | p. 8 |
| Predicting All-in-One-Go | p. 12 |
| Pitfalls of Fold Recognition | p. 14 |
| References | p. 16 |
| 'Meta' Approaches to Protein Structure Prediction | p. 23 |
| Introduction | p. 23 |
| The Utility of Servers as Standard Tools for Protein Structure Prediction | p. 24 |
| Consensus 'Meta-Predictors': Is the Whole Greater Than the Sum of the Parts? | p. 25 |
| Automated Meta-Predictors | p. 26 |
| Hybrid Methods: Going Beyond the "Simple Selection" of Models | p. 29 |
| Future Prospects | p. 31 |
| References | p. 32 |
| From Molecular Modeling to Drug Design | p. 35 |
| Introduction | p. 35 |
| General Context | p. 35 |
| Comparative Modeling | p. 36 |
| Drug Design and Screening | p. 37 |
| Comparative Modeling | p. 38 |
| Sequence Gathering and Alignment | p. 38 |
| Sequence Database Searches | p. 38 |
| Multiple Sequence Alignments | p. 39 |
| Structural Alignments | p. 39 |
| Fold Recognition | p. 40 |
| Structural Alignment Refinement | p. 40 |
| Active Site Recognition | p. 41 |
| A Biological Application | p. 42 |
| Complete Model Achievement | p. 43 |
| Global Structure Modeling | p. 44 |
| Optimization of Side-Chain Conformation | p. 44 |
| Insertions/Deletions Building | p. 46 |
| Modeling Protein Quaternary Structures | p. 47 |
| Energy Minimization and Molecular Dynamics | p. 48 |
| Model Validation | p. 49 |
| Theoretical Model Validation | p. 49 |
| Ligand-Based Model Selection | p. 50 |
| Experimental Evaluation of Models | p. 50 |
| Current Limitations | p. 51 |
| Model-Based Drug Design | p. 52 |
| Comparative Drug Design | p. 53 |
| Docking Methodologies | p. 55 |
| Knowledge-Based Potentials | p. 55 |
| Regression-Based (or Empirical) Methods | p. 56 |
| Physics-Based Methods | p. 56 |
| Flexible Models | p. 57 |
| Fragment-Based Drug Design | p. 58 |
| Virtual Screening Using Models | p. 58 |
| Docking Onto Medium Resolution Models | p. 58 |
| Docking Onto High-Resolution Models | p. 59 |
| Pharmacogenomic Applications | p. 60 |
| A Challenging Application: the GPCRs | p. 60 |
| Family-Wide Docking | p. 60 |
| Side Effect Predictions | p. 61 |
| Drug Metabolization Predictions | p. 61 |
| Conclusions | p. 62 |
| References | p. 63 |
| Structure Determination of Macromolecular Complexes by Experiment and Computation | p. 73 |
| Introduction | p. 73 |
| Hybrid Approaches to Determination of Assembly Structures | p. 77 |
| Modeling the Low-Resolution Structures of Assemblies | p. 78 |
| Representation of Molecular Assemblies | p. 80 |
| Scoring Function Consisting of Individual Spatial Restraints | p. 80 |
| Optimization of the Scoring Function | p. 81 |
| Analysis of the Models | p. 81 |
| Comparative Modeling for Structure Determination of Macromolecular Complexes | p. 82 |
| Automated Comparative Protein Structure Modeling | p. 82 |
| Accuracy of Comparative Models | p. 84 |
| Prediction of Model Accuracy | p. 86 |
| Docking of Comparative Models into Low-Resolution Cryo-EM Maps | p. 86 |
| Example 1: A Partial Molecular Model of the 80S Ribosome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae | p. 88 |
| Example 2: A Molecular Model of the E. coli 70S Ribosome | p. 90 |
| Conclusions | p. 91 |
| References | p. 92 |
| Modeling Protein Folding Pathways | p. 97 |
| Introduction: Darwin Versus Boltzmann | p. 95 |
| Protein Folding Pathway History | p. 98 |
| Knowledge-Based Models for Folding Pathways | p. 99 |
| I-sites: A Library of Folding Initiation Site Motifs | p. 99 |
| HMMSTR: A Hidden Markov Model for Grammatical Structure | p. 100 |
| ROSETTA: Folding Simulations Using a Fragment Library | p. 101 |
| Results of Fully Automated I-SITES/ROSETTA Simulations | p. 102 |
| Summary | p. 102 |
| Topologically Correct Large Fragment Predictions Are Found | p. 103 |
| Good Local Structure Correlates Weakly with Good Tertiary Structure | p. 104 |
| Average Contact Order Is Too Low | p. 105 |
| How Could Automated ROSETTA Be Improved? | p. 105 |
| HMMSTR-CM: Folding Pathways Using Contact Maps | p. 106 |
| A Knowledge-Based Potential for Motif-Motif Interactions | p. 106 |
| Fold Recognition Using Contact Potential Maps | p. 108 |
| Consensus and Composite Contact Map Predictions | p. 111 |
| Ab Initio Rule-Based Pathway Predictions | p. 111 |
| Selected Results of HMMSTR-CM Blind Structure Predictions | p. 112 |
| A Prediction Using Templates and a Pathway | p. 113 |
| A Prediction Using Several Templates | p. 113 |
| Correct Prediction Using Only the Folding Pathway | p. 114 |
| False Prediction Using the Folding Pathway. What Went Wrong? | p. 116 |
| Future Directions for HMMTR-CM | p. 117 |
| Conclusions | p. 118 |
| References | p. 118 |
| Structural Bioinformatics and NMR Structure Determination | p. 123 |
| Introduction: NMR and Structural Bioinformatics | p. 123 |
| Algorithms for NMR Structure Calculation | p. 124 |
| Distance Geometry and Data Consistency | p. 124 |
| Nonlinear Optimization | p. 125 |
| Sampling Conformational Space | p. 126 |
| Modelling Structures with Limited Data Sets | p. 126 |
| Internal Dynamics and NMR Structure Determination | p. 127 |
| Calculating NMR Parameters from Molecular Dynamics Simulations | p. 127 |
| Inferring Dynamics from NMR Data | p. 127 |
| Structure Validation | p. 128 |
| Structural Genomics by NMR | p. 129 |
| Automated Assignment and Data Analysis | p. 129 |
| Collaborative Computing Project for NMR (CCPN) | p. 130 |
| SPINS | p. 132 |
| Databanks and Databases | p. 132 |
| BioMagResBank and PDB/RCSB | p. 133 |
| Conclusions | p. 133 |
| References | p. 134 |
| Bioinformatics-Guided Identification and Experimental Characterization of Novel RNA Methyltransferases | p. 139 |
| Introduction | p. 139 |
| Diversity of Methylated Nucleosides in RNA | p. 139 |
| RNA Methyltransferases | p. 141 |
| Structural Biology of RNA MTases and Their Relatives | p. 142 |
| Traditional and Novel Approaches to Identification of New RNA-Modification Enzymes | p. 145 |
| Bioinformatics: Terminology, Methodology, and Applications to RNA MTases | p. 146 |
| The Top-Down Approach | p. 149 |
| Top-Down Search for Novel RNA:m[superscript 5]C MTases in Yeast | p. 151 |
| Top-Down Search for Bacterial and Archaeal m[superscript 1]A MTases | p. 152 |
| Top-Down Search for Novel Yeast 2'-O-MTases | p. 153 |
| The Bottom-Up Approach | p. 155 |
| Bottom-Up Search for New Yeast RNA MTases | p. 157 |
| Conclusions | p. 160 |
| References | p. 162 |
| Finding Missing tRNA Modification Genes: A Comparative Genomics Goldmine | p. 169 |
| Missing tRNA Modification Genes | p. 169 |
| tRNA Modifications | p. 169 |
| Compilation of the Missing tRNA Modification Genes | p. 170 |
| Comparative Genomics: an Emerging Tool to Identify Missing Genes | p. 173 |
| Finding Genes for Simple tRNA Modifications | p. 175 |
| Paralog- and Ortholog-Based Identifications | p. 175 |
| Comparative Genomics-Based Identifications | p. 176 |
| Finding Complex Modification Pathway Genes | p. 178 |
| Finding Missing Steps in Known Pathways | p. 178 |
| Finding Uncharacterized Pathway Genes | p. 179 |
| Identification of the preQ Biosynthesis Pathway Genes | p. 179 |
| Hunting for the Wyeosine Biosynthesis Genes | p. 182 |
| Conclusions | p. 183 |
| References | p. 184 |
| Evolution and Function of Processosome, the Complex That Assembles Ribosomes in Eukaryotes: Clues from Comparative Sequence Analysis | p. 191 |
| Introduction | p. 191 |
| Sequence Analysis of the Processosome Components | p. 192 |
| Intrinsic Features | p. 193 |
| Evolutionarily Conserved Sequence Domains | p. 195 |
| Kre33p, or Possibly AtAc: Protein with Multiple Predicted Activities | p. 204 |
| Imp4/Ssf1/Rpf1/Brx1/Peter Pan Family of Proteins | p. 209 |
| Diverse RNA-Binding Domains and Limited Repertoire of Globular Protein Interaction Modules | p. 211 |
| Phyletic Patterns | p. 212 |
| Concluding Remarks | p. 216 |
| References | p. 217 |
| Bioinformatics-Guided Experimental Characterization of Mismatch-Repair Enzymes and Their Relatives | p. 221 |
| Introduction | p. 221 |
| Sau3AI and Related Restriction Endonucleases | p. 222 |
| DNA Mismatch Repair | p. 223 |
| Nicking Endonuclease MutH | p. 224 |
| Sau3AI - Similar Folds for N- and C-Terminal Domains | p. 225 |
| Fold Recognition for the C-terminal of Sau3AI | p. 225 |
| Biochemical and Biophysical Analysis - Evidence for a Pseudotetramer That Induces DNA Looping | p. 227 |
| Identification of the Methylation Sensor of MutH | p. 232 |
| Evolutionary Trace Analysis | p. 233 |
| Superposition of MutH with REases in Complexes with DNA | p. 235 |
| Mutational Analysis of MutH | p. 236 |
| Conclusions | p. 238 |
| References | p. 239 |
| Predicting Functional Residues in DNA Glycosylases by Analysis of Structure and Conservation | p. 243 |
| Introduction | p. 243 |
| Generating Predictions: Sequence Selection and Analysis | p. 244 |
| Testing the Predictions: Mutational Analysis of Residues Defining Substrate Specificity in Formamidopyrimidine-DNA Glycosylase | p. 251 |
| Refining the Predictions: Analysis of Substrate Specificity in the Endonuclease III Family | p. 254 |
| References | p. 259 |
| Subject Index | p. 263 |
| Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved. |