Get Free Shipping on orders over $79
The Moral Wager : Evolution and Contract - Malcolm Murray

The Moral Wager

Evolution and Contract

By: Malcolm Murray

eText | 5 May 2007

At a Glance

eText


$159.01

or 4 interest-free payments of $39.75 with

 or 

Instant online reading in your Booktopia eTextbook Library *

Why choose an eTextbook?

Instant Access *

Purchase and read your book immediately

Read Aloud

Listen and follow along as Bookshelf reads to you

Study Tools

Built-in study tools like highlights and more

* eTextbooks are not downloadable to your eReader or an app and can be accessed via web browsers only. You must be connected to the internet and have no technical issues with your device or browser that could prevent the eTextbook from operating.
In the following chapters, I offer an evolutionary account of morality and from that extrapolate a version of contractarianism I call consent theory. Game theory helps to highlight the evolution of morality as a resolution of interpersonal conflicts under strategic negotiation. It is this emphasis on strategic negotiation that underwrites the idea of consent. Consent theory differs from other contractarian models by abandoning reliance on rational self-interest in favour of evolutionary adaptation. From this, more emphasis will be placed on consent as natural convergence rather than consent as an idealization. My picture of contractarianism, then, ends up looking more like the relativist model offered by Harman, rather than the rational (or pseudo-rational) model offered by Gauthier, let alone the Kantian brands of Rawls or Scanlon. So at least some of my discussion will dwell on why it is no loss to abandon hope for the universal, categorical morality that rational models promise. In the introduction, I offer the betting analogy that underwrites the remaining picture. There are some bets where the expected utility is positive, though the odds of winning on this particular occasion are exceedingly low. In such cases, we cannot hope to give an argument that taking the bet is rational. The only thing we can say is that those predisposed to take this kind of bet on these kinds of occasions will do better than those with other dispositions, so long as such games occur often enough.
on
Desktop
Tablet
Mobile

Other Editions and Formats

Paperback

Published: 28th October 2010

More in Ethics & Moral Philosophy

Moral Courage - Rushworth M. Kidder

eBOOK

RRP $28.99

$23.99

17%
OFF
The Good Life : Truths That Last in Times of Need - Peter J. Gomes

eBOOK

Help : The Original Human Dilemma - Garret Keizer

eBOOK

RRP $25.99

$20.99

19%
OFF
The Icarus Syndrome : A History of American Hubris - Peter Beinart

eBOOK

What Mama Taught Me : The Seven Core Values of Life - Tony Brown

eBOOK