T he author explains that the writing of these phrases and poems was not a neutral aesthetic exercise,
but an intentional gesture of liberation and resistance in the face of adverse circumstances.
Each text was conceived as a way not to remain silent,
an active response that seeks to reclaim the word against oppression, indifference, or the crisis symbolized by the "storm."
Far from being isolated pieces, the writings are projected as deliberate traces:
marks that persist and testify to a will to exist and be remembered.
At the same time, the author acknowledges that the meaning of these texts is completed through reading;
the work is not closed in itself, but is renewed and comes alive each time someone picks it up, interprets it, and carries it forward.
For this reason, he expresses gratitude to the readers:
their attention turns the body of work into something living, into a constant rebirth.
Thus, the book is conceived as a collective and dynamic project,
one that crosses time and circumstance through the connection between writer and reader.
In sum, writing here functions as a political and emotional act,
and reading becomes the force that prolongs and legitimizes that act,
