"
Enumerations is a valuable and timely book that demonstrates the current depth and breadth of quantitative Digital Humanities scholarship for both literary and DH audiences. Arguing for the increased inclusion of computational data within literary criticism, Piper asks and answers intriguing literary questions while also suggesting new research directions...
Enumerations successfully bridges the two disparate discourses of the
digital and the
humanities. Bringing sophisticated and robust computational power to literary criticism, Piper never loses touch with the humanistic questions and values that shape literary studies."-- "Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies"
"
Enumerations benefits from the similar breadth of Piper's erudition. It is comparative in the best sense, spanning centuries, languages, and national traditions...It is richly informed by theory. And its quantitative methods are both sophisticated and well explained for lay readers."--Matthew Wilkens "American Literary History"
"Enumerations is a landmark. No book has succeeded half so well in bridging the stubborn divide between numbers and letters in literary study. To his Swiss-army-knife proficiency in data science, book history, and close reading, Piper adds a rare measure of generosity and tact. The book extends itself as an open invitation and encouragement to anyone interested in problems of literary method."-- "James F. English, University of Pennsylvania"
"Andrew Piper's ambitious and timely book introduces a range of new concepts and approaches into the ongoing debate about the role and implications of computational text analysis for literary studies. In place of the hyperbolic emphasis on size and scale in 'distant reading' he explores the possibilities of repetitive, implicated, distributed, and diagrammatic reading. Uniting these diverse approaches by deploying notions of translation and entanglement, Piper explores the multiple ways in which computational readings always and inevitably participate in the construction of meaning. As well as clearly and incisively describing methods for computational text analysis, Piper uses them to address longstanding questions in literary studies, ranging from nature of poetic contrasts and plot development to the relationship of life, death and aesthetics, and the shape of literary oeuvres. In doing so he foregrounds and advances the traditions and concerns that computational and non-computational literary scholars share in common in a way that bridges and exceeds the differences in method that sometimes threaten to divide them."
-- "Katherine Bode, Australian National University"
"
Enumerations is a landmark study in the interactions between computational formalism and literary theoretical approaches. Piper does sterling work in making the mathematics and computation accessible but out of the limelight, while also providing more detail for those who are interested."-- "Modern Philology"
"Mathematical reasoning and literary insight dovetail in
Enumerations. This beautifully written book uses numbers to make the texture of poetry and fiction surprising, so we can reflect more deeply on habitual pleasures. Piper's readers will come away knowing how to do new things with data, but also with a better understanding of characterization, plot, and the nature of fiction itself.
Enumerations is not just an important book but a foundational one for this emerging field."-- "Ted Underwood, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign"
"This is the book that literary studies needs. To read
Enumerations is to follow the movement of a mind lit up by the new interpretive pathways that computational reading opens, and thus to see demonstrated before one's eyes its enormous significance. From massive questions like 'What is fiction?' to miniscule matters like 'What details allow us to see two poems as similar?, ' Piper uses computational modeling to defamiliarize the act of literary interpretation. One puts down
Enumerations with a sense of how rich a field literary studies is, of how many questions we still have to ask, of how much work we have to do. In language that is theoretically sophisticated and technically straightforward--that leaps gracefully from Barthes's 'non-sentence' to the concept of distributional semantics--Piper finally answers literary scholars' persistent 'So what?'"-- "Adam Hammond, University of Toronto"
