Get Free Shipping on orders over $79
Re-Reasoning Ethics : The Rationality of Deliberation and Judgment in Ethics - Barry Hoffmaster

Re-Reasoning Ethics

The Rationality of Deliberation and Judgment in Ethics

By: Barry Hoffmaster, Cliff Hooker

eText | 11 May 2018

At a Glance

eText


$48.55

or 4 interest-free payments of $12.14 with

 or 

Instant online reading in your Booktopia eTextbook Library *

Why choose an eTextbook?

Instant Access *

Purchase and read your book immediately

Read Aloud

Listen and follow along as Bookshelf reads to you

Study Tools

Built-in study tools like highlights and more

* eTextbooks are not downloadable to your eReader or an app and can be accessed via web browsers only. You must be connected to the internet and have no technical issues with your device or browser that could prevent the eTextbook from operating.

How developing a more expansive, non-formal conception of reason produces richer ethical understandings of human situations, explored and illustrated with many real examples.

In Re-Reasoning Ethics, Barry Hoffmaster and Cliff Hooker enhance and empower ethics by adopting a non-formal paradigm of rational deliberation as intelligent problem-solving and a complementary non-formal paradigm of ethical deliberation as problem-solving design to promote human flourishing. The non-formal conception of reason produces broader and richer ethical understandings of human situations, not the simple, constrained depictions provided by moral theories and their logical applications in medical ethics and bioethics. Instead, it delivers and vindicates the moral judgment that complex, contextual, and dynamic situations require.

Hoffmaster and Hooker demonstrate how this more expansive rationality operates with examples, first in science and then in ethics. Non-formal reason brings rationality not just to the empirical world of science but also to the empirical realities of human lives. Among the many real cases they present is that of how women at risk of having children with genetic conditions decide whether to try to become pregnant. These women do not apply the formal principle of maximizing expected utility (as advised by genetic counselors) and instead imagine scenarios of what their lives could be like with an affected child and assess whether they could accept the worst of these scenarios.

Hoffmaster and Hooker explain how moral compromise and a liberated, extended, and enriched reflective equilibrium expand and augment rational ethical deliberation and how that deliberation can rationally design ethical practices, institutions, and policies.

on
Desktop
Tablet
Mobile

More in Ethics & Moral Philosophy

Moral Courage - Rushworth M. Kidder

eBOOK

RRP $28.99

$23.20

20%
OFF
The Good Life : Truths That Last in Times of Need - Peter J. Gomes

eBOOK

Help : The Original Human Dilemma - Garret Keizer

eBOOK

RRP $25.99

$20.99

19%
OFF
The Icarus Syndrome : A History of American Hubris - Peter Beinart

eBOOK