Einstein Was Wrong! : However, Einstein supported the correct ideas (1) measurable descriptions of stable physical-systems need to be based on stable coordinate-structures, and (2) that Quantum Physics cannot be identified as being correct - Martin Concoyle

Einstein Was Wrong!

However, Einstein supported the correct ideas (1) measurable descriptions of stable physical-systems need to be based on stable coordinate-structures, and (2) that Quantum Physics cannot be identified as being correct

By: Martin Concoyle

eBook | 9 May 2025

At a Glance

eBook


$7.87

or 4 interest-free payments of $1.97 with

Instant Digital Delivery to your Kobo Reader App

Introduction

In order to read this book a person must make decisions about:

(1) does the person believe that new types of clean, cheap, small, and light-weight energy-sources are needed by the people in the civilization in which we live?

And

(2) does the person believe that the laws of physics identify the complete truth about how one must measurably describe the (stable) physical-systems of the physical world,

despite the fact that the very large set of stable MBFC-spectral-and-orbital physical-systems of all size-scales have no measurable descriptions of their simple, measurable spectral-and-orbital properties, based on the laws of physics,

and

(3) does the person think that the measurable descriptions of the (small) physical systems must be based on a probability math structure, as stated in the laws of QP,

despite the fact that,

(3a ) none of the elements of the very large set of stable MBFC-spectral physical-systems of all size-scales, ie elementary-particles, nuclei, atoms, and molecules, can be given properly defined probability math structures, based on being able to confine the MBFC's to closed and bounded regions of geometry-space, which, in turn, is based on the laws of physics,

and hence, there cannot be defined any standing-inertial-wave for such a physical-system,

and so that, the laws of QP cannot be applied to such a physical context,

and despite the fact that

(3b ) the measured property of distantly-separated system-components possess a non-local connection to one another,

and which also exists in a context in which the two separated system-components are continuing to move away from one another,

and

thus, such diverging system-component-pair movement does not allow for a geometric region..., which contains the distantly separated system-components...., to be placed into a context of being a closed and bounded region of geometry-space,

and hence there cannot be defined any standing-inertial-wave for such a physical-system, and so that the laws of QP cannot be applied to such a physical context,

and

where such decisions by the reader must be made,

Because these new ideas about physics and math, as expressed in the books by m concoyle (see bibliography), do not fit into the institutional dogmas about physics and math,

however, such imperial institutional dogmas possess a very large and persistent blind-spot,

and these new ideas about physics and math finally fix this major problem,

namely, that the very large set of stable MBFC-spectral-and-orbital physical-systems of all size-scales have no measurable description of their somewhat simple measurable spectral-and/or-orbital properties, based on the laws of physics,

and

the new principles about the measurable descriptions of stable physical-systems can provide measurable descriptions for all of the elements of the big set of stable MBFC-spectral-and-orbital physical-systems (see chapter 2 of this book),,

and

the new principles about the measurable descriptions of stable MBFC-spectral-and-orbital physical-systems, also apply to all the solvable inertial-pde-models of system-component inertial-interactions, which are defined by the laws of physics,

ie the new principles identify the math property, namely, that the inertial-pde must be formulated on parallelizable-coordinate-shapes, in order for the inertial-pde to be solvable, where this property of the inertial-pde's..., where the pde's are associated to the laws of physics..., is needed, in order to be able to solve any of the solvable inertial-pde-models of system-component inertial-interactions, which, in turn, identify the math context associated to the laws of physics,

and

the set of solvable inertial-pde-models of physical-systems, as identified by the laws of physics, in turn, identify a proper small subset.... of the new larger range of stable MBFC-spectral-and-orbital physical-systems, which can now be measurably described, by using the new principle about the math context, which is associated to the new larger range of the set of stable physical-systems, which now have measurable descriptions, which can be measurably verified,

however,

such new ideas should be welcomed by humanity, because they lead to a new language, which, in turn, identifies the new structures of stable and measurable existence, around which new technologies can be developed,

A new set of different types of technologies can now emerge, especially, if the learned institutions of humanity seriously consider, and then use the new ideas,

and

the new ideas about physics and math have clear implications about a wide range of possibilities concerning the history of humanity,

is the archaeological evidence of technically advanced elaborate constructions, which are built upon very massive, and very large, and very hard-rocks, and then lifted and formed into large rock monuments, best interpreted to be about the technology of space-traveling beings, who travel between stars and galaxies by means of (slow-moving) rocket-powered space-ships,

or

is this surprising and ancient context of human culture about something else; is it about a new set of coordinate-structures, which more properly identify the properties of existence?

eg is it about a new mathematical model of the property of non-localness, wherein, the property of non-local relations between distantly separated system-components can be used in new practically useful ways? eg instantaneous travel between stars and galaxies,

eg is it about the coordinate-structure of existence, and/or something about the coordinate-structures of life-forms,

eg but, furthermore, it can be claimed that,

us humans have surprising physical capabilities, which we have forgotten that we possess,

and/but

where, in turn, such forgetfulness, implies that something has altered our state-of-awareness,

eg a new idea about the coordinate-containment of existence, can be used to explain such forgetfulness,

and

the new coordinate-and-new-language-structures..., which are used within a context of the new principles, about the measurable descriptions of stable physical-systems...., and which result in:

(1) a new regionally-unified morphogenetic-field model of life-forms, and which is also an energy-generating model of life-forms,

and

the mixing together of both

(2a ) the stable and measurable language of

science,

and

(2b ) the lyrical language about the properties of

the spirit,

that is, this is not a new language, whose focus is on speculating about the relation of (today's) technology to, a material existence,

rather, this new language identifies a new structure for existence, around which new technologies can be developed,

and

where the new technologies are developed around the new coordinate-metric-space-structures,

where, this is about a set of parallelizable-coordinate-structures, which exist in the constant-curvature coordinate-metric-spaces, ie geometry-space, hyperbolic-velocity-space, and some of the dimensional levels of spherical-spaces,

and

where this set of coordinate-structures, are used in the measurable descriptions of stable physical-systems,

and

which can be used to also change our ideas about the properties of the spirit,

but

arbitrarily authoritarian empires are never willing to change,

on

More in Physics

A Universe From Nothing - Lawrence M. Krauss

eBOOK

Coming of Age in the Milky Way - Timothy Ferris

eBOOK

RRP $37.39

$29.99

20%
OFF