Get Free Shipping on orders over $79
Computer Vision - ECCV 2008 : 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part I - David Forsyth

Computer Vision - ECCV 2008

10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part I

By: David Forsyth, ?Philip Torr, ?Andrew Zisserman

eText | 13 October 2008 | Edition Number 1

At a Glance

eText


$159.01

or 4 interest-free payments of $39.75 with

 or 

Instant online reading in your Booktopia eTextbook Library *

Why choose an eTextbook?

Instant Access *

Purchase and read your book immediately

Read Aloud

Listen and follow along as Bookshelf reads to you

Study Tools

Built-in study tools like highlights and more

* eTextbooks are not downloadable to your eReader or an app and can be accessed via web browsers only. You must be connected to the internet and have no technical issues with your device or browser that could prevent the eTextbook from operating.
Welcome to the 2008EuropeanConference onComputer Vision. These proce- ings are the result of a great deal of hard work by many people. To produce them, a total of 871 papers were reviewed. Forty were selected for oral pres- tation and 203 were selected for poster presentation, yielding acceptance rates of 4.6% for oral, 23.3% for poster, and 27.9% in total. Weappliedthreeprinciples.First,sincewehadastronggroupofAreaChairs, the ?nal decisions to accept or reject a paper rested with the Area Chair, who wouldbeinformedbyreviewsandcouldactonlyinconsensuswithanotherArea Chair. Second, we felt that authors were entitled to a summary that explained how the Area Chair reached a decision for a paper. Third, we were very careful to avoid con?icts of interest. Each paper was assigned to an Area Chair by the Program Chairs, and each Area Chair received a pool of about 25 papers. The Area Chairs then identi?ed and rankedappropriatereviewersfor eachpaper in their pool, and a constrained optimization allocated three reviewers to each paper. We are very proud that every paper received at least three reviews. At this point, authors were able to respond to reviews. The Area Chairs then needed to reach a decision. We used a series of procedures to ensure careful review and to avoid con?icts of interest. ProgramChairs did not submit papers. The Area Chairs were divided into three groups so that no Area Chair in the group was in con?ict with any paper assigned to any Area Chair in the group.
on
Desktop
Tablet
Mobile

More in Data Mining

Investing for Programmers - Stefan Papp

eBOOK

Conquering the Decision Abyss - Keith Hartley

eBOOK

RRP $15.39

$14.99

Big Data Analytics - Nitin Kumar Yadav

eBOOK

Data Engineering for Data-Driven Marketing - Balamurugan Baluswamy

eBOOK

RRP $185.82

$157.99

15%
OFF