As humanity becomes increasingly interconnected through globalisation, the question of whether community is possible within culturally diverse societies has returned as a principle concern for contemporary thought. Lorenzo Simpson charges that the current discussion is stuck at an impasse between postmodernism's fragmented notions of cultural difference and humanism's homogeneous versions of community. Simpson traces the debate between community and difference thorough the works of Matthew Arnold, J.G. von Herder, Theodor Adorno, Jnrgen Habermas, Iris Young and others and proposes an alternative - one that bridges cultural differences without erasing them. He argues that we must establish common aesthetic and ethical standards incorporating sensitivity to difference if we are able to achieve cross-cultural understanding.
"Simpson offers a sensitive and powerful argument for a conception of humanism defensible in the 21st century."
-William Outhwaite, author of "Habermas: A Critical Introduction
"Simpson's defense of humanism as a 'situated cosmopolitanism' displays tremendous range. Few philosophers have mastered the nuances of music theory, cultural criticism, postmodernism, hermeneutics, and critical theory to the same degree; and those who have seldom write with such clarity."
-David Ingram, Loyola University of Chicago
"Responding to the philosophical situation of our time in which the voices of postmodernism, declaring the death of humanism and the bankruptcy of reason, wage war against the Enlightenment concepts of a common humanity and a rational social order, Lorenzo Simpson deftly splits the difference as he wends his way towards a new perspective on rationality and a viable humanism for the new millennium. This skillfully crafted volume should become required reading for all those who have worries about the future of philosophy."
-Calvin O. Schrag, Purdue University
"This brilliant new work critically addresses and comparatively evaluates the implications of modernism and postmodernism on multiculturalism. Neither emerge unscathed, but Simpson takes the positive contributions of each to develop a post-metaphysical humanism, one that acknowledges that individuals can never wholly transcend their culture and history--their identity, in other words--but that also rejects the permanence of absolute difference or incomprehension across cultural divides. Humanity, Simpson, urges, will be forged rather than found, and as such, is the unfinished project yet to beaccomplished."
-Linda Martin Alcoff, Syracuse University
"A thoughtful essay by a philosopher who has learned much from Habermas, but also has a good ear for jazz. That ear serves him well as he charts his course towards a postmetaphysical, multicultural humanism, between the Scylla of Eurocentric arrogance and the Charybdis of postmodern condescension."
-Karsten Harries, Yale University