Sentencing, Public Opinion, and Criminal Justice

the Rt Hon Sir Colman Treacy: Foreword Gabrielle Watson and Marie Manikis: Editors' Introduction PART I. Fundamentals of Sentencing and Penal Theory 1: Andrew Ashworth: Culpability, Consequences, and Sentencing 2: RA Duff: 'Responsive Penal Censure' and Its Implications 3: Jesper Ryberg: How to Delimit the Desert Base of Criminal Offenders: On Roberts' Dynamic Censure Model 4: Marie Manikis: The Evolution of Proportionality in Sentencing: Strengthening Communication and Individualization 5: Netanel Dagan and David P Cole: Retributivism and the 'Black Boxes' of Imprisonment 6: Leo Zaibert: Pluralism in the Justification of Punishment 7: Gabrielle Watson: Sentencing Ethically PART II. Sentencing Policy and Penal Practice 8: David M Paciocco: Professor Roberts' Disproportionate Contribution to Proportionality 9: Anthony N Doob and Jane B Sprott: In Search of Proportionate Sentencing 10: Richard S Frase: Questioning the Fairness and Utility of Prior Record Sentence Enhancements 11: Antje du Bois-Pedain: Guiding Sentencers: The Value and Disvalue of Sentencing Guidelines 12: Kent Roach: When Is a Sentence a Miscarriage of Justice? 13: Arie Freiberg: Beyond the Dreaming Spires: Julian V Roberts as Scholar and Policy Entrepreneur PART III. Public Opinion and Criminal Justice 14: Mike Hough: Thirty-Five Years of Research on Attitudes to Punishment 15: Michael Tonry: Vigilantism and 'Public Confidence': The Pertinence of Public Opinion to Sentencing 16: Nicola Padfield: Victims at Parole Lucia Zedner: Afterword