Derivation or Representation? Hubert Haider & Klaus Netter 1 The Issue Derivation and Representation - these keywords refer both to a conceptual as well as to an empirical issue. Transformational grammar was in its outset (Chomsky 1957, 1975) a derivational theory which characterized a well-formed sentence by its derivation, i.e. a set of syntactic representations defined by a set of rules that map one representation into another. The set of mapping- rules, the transformations, eventually became more and more abstract and were trivialized into a single one, namely "move a" , a general movement-rule. The constraints on movement were singled out in systems of principles that ap- ply to the resulting representations, i.e. the configurations containing a moved element and its extraction site, the trace. The introduction of trace-theory (d. Chomsky 1977, ch.3 17, ch. 4) in principle opened up the possibility of com- pletely abandoning movement and generating the possible outputs of movement directly, i.e. as structures that contain gaps representing the extraction sites.
NP-Movement, Crossover and Chain-Formation.- NP-Movement and Expletive Chains.- Chain Formation, Reanalysis, and the Economy of Levels.- On Reconstruction and Coordination.- An Argument for Movement.- Barriers and the Theory of Binding.- Levels and Empty Categories in a Principles and Parameters Approach to Parsing.- Notes on Contributors.- Index of Names.- Index of Subjects.
Series: STUDIES IN NATURAL LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC THEORY
Number Of Pages: 320
Published: 31st March 1991
Country of Publication: NL
Dimensions (cm): 25.4 x 17.15
Weight (kg): 0.65