
Non-Compliance of National Courts
Remedies in European Community Law and Beyond
Hardcover | 27 October 2005
At a Glance
240 Pages
23.5 x 15.88 x 1.91
Hardcover
$76.99
or 4 interest-free payments of $19.25 with
orShips in 5 to 7 business days
In line with developments in international law, and in particular with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, the ECJ has recently stepped up itslevel of scrutiny with regard to national courts incorrectly applying Community law. As a consequence of a sequence of strong rulings, there is now a clear trend towards holding states accountable for their courts. By contrast, national laws traditionally tend to shield states from accountability for judicial conduct.
This book is the first to deal with possible legal responses in the Community legal order and beyond, when national courts incorrectly apply Community law. Rooted in a rigorous contextual analysis of recent jurisprudence, this work discusses various alternatives for future developments in the Court?s case law. The author explains the often uneasy nature of the relationship betweennational courts and the ECJ. He explores common concerns voiced against an excessive degree of accountability for judicial conduct.
This work is based on extensive research on European Community law and adjacent areas of public international law. It is highly recommended to academics and advanced law students, as well as practitioners in the field of Community law, including national judges, policy makers and government officials.
Bernhard Hofstoetter studied law at the Universities of Vienna, Oslo, Leuven (magna cum laude) and St. Gallen (magna cum laude). He is presently an Assistant Professor of European Law at the University of Fribourg and a visiting lecturer at the Academia Istropolitana Nova in Bratislava.
| Preface | p. VII |
| Acknowledgements | p. IX |
| Abbreviations | p. XV |
| Introduction | p. 1 |
| Effectuating Effectiveness in European Community Law | p. 7 |
| The 'Transformation of Europe' and a Prior Transformation in Public International Law | p. 9 |
| National Courts and 'National Procedural Autonomy' | p. 14 |
| A strategy of minimum interference | p. 24 |
| A growing concern over effectiveness | p. 26 |
| Setting aside national 'remedies' | p. 27 |
| Creating new remedies | p. 28 |
| Creating new remedies and spelling out minimum conditions for their exercise | p. 31 |
| A more balanced approach | p. 33 |
| Critique and conclusion | p. 34 |
| State Liability for Judicial Wrongs - Basic Notions | p. 39 |
| Extension to judicial acts - the problem | p. 39 |
| Non-compliant courts | p. 41 |
| Primary and secondary proceedings | p. 43 |
| Three Hypotheses on the Necessity of State Liability for Judicial Acts in the Community Legal Order | p. 45 |
| International Law Hypothesis I: State Liability As Refined 'State Responsibility' Tailored to the Individualising Nature of the Community Legal Order | p. 49 |
| Community law refers to public international law | p. 50 |
| Attribution of courts to the State in public international law | p. 55 |
| From the early days to the twentieth century | p. 55 |
| Contemporary practice | p. 57 |
| Separation of attribution from substantive issues | p. 57 |
| The ILC's Draft Articles on State Responsibility | p. 58 |
| Practice of international courts concerning the attribution of national courts to the State | p. 61 |
| Scholarly comment | p. 63 |
| Conclusion | p. 64 |
| Transferability to Community law? | p. 65 |
| Conclusion | p. 70 |
| International Law-Hypothesis II: The Imperatives of the Protection of Fundamental Rights Are Such As to Require State Liability for Judicial Acts | p. 71 |
| Procedural guarantees - Articles 6 and 13 of the ECHR | p. 71 |
| Substantive guarantees - Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 | p. 75 |
| Conclusion | p. 78 |
| Comparative Law-Hypothesis: State Liability for Judicial Acts Is a General Principle Common to the Legal Traditions of the Member States | p. 79 |
| Alleging a general principle | p. 80 |
| Conclusion | p. 84 |
| Conclusion | p. 86 |
| Reservations for Community Law | p. 89 |
| Grounds Causing Hesitation | p. 91 |
| Judicial independence | p. 91 |
| The doctrine of res judicata | p. 95 |
| Impartiality of the judiciary | p. 107 |
| Endangering the spirit of co-operation between the ECJ and national courts? | p. 108 |
| Litis finiri opportet or endless litigation within 'reasonable time' (Article 6 of the ECHR)? | p. 112 |
| The parallelism between State liability and the community's extra-contractual liability regime | p. 114 |
| Undesirable power gain for the ECJ? | p. 118 |
| Conclusion | p. 120 |
| Which Standard of Liability for Judicial Acts? | p. 123 |
| The Additional Standard of 'Manifest Infringement' of Community Law | p. 126 |
| Criteria to Be Taken into Account by National Courts | p. 131 |
| Breach of the duty to refer pursuant to Article 234(3) of the EC Treaty | p. 132 |
| Conclusion | p. 135 |
| The Application of the Standard of Manifest Infringement in Kobler | p. 136 |
| Need to Delimit the Judiciary from the Other State Functions | p. 142 |
| What is a court for the purposes of State liability? | p. 144 |
| Do only courts of last instance trigger State liability? | p. 144 |
| What is a court of last instance for the purposes of State liability? | p. 146 |
| Conclusion | p. 150 |
| Conclusion | p. 150 |
| Necessary Institutional Arrangements in the Member States to Facilitate State Liability for Judicial Acts - A Case Study on Austria | p. 153 |
| Community Law Background | p. 155 |
| State Liability for Judicial Acts under Austrian law | p. 161 |
| State liability pursuant to the law on official liability (Amtshaftungsgesetz - AHG) | p. 161 |
| State liability pursuant to Article 137 of the Austrian Federal Constitutional Law | p. 170 |
| Concluding assessment | p. 171 |
| Alternative Remedies | p. 177 |
| Kuhne & Heitz and an Approach of 'Try Again'? | p. 179 |
| The Action for Infringement | p. 181 |
| Deficiencies | p. 182 |
| Commission v. Italy | p. 183 |
| Relationship between Kobler liability and the action for infringement | p. 188 |
| The Residuary Role of the ECrtHR | p. 189 |
| Conclusion | p. 191 |
| Epilogue | p. 195 |
| Bibliography | p. 207 |
| Table of Cases | p. 217 |
| Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved. |
ISBN: 9789067042055
ISBN-10: 9067042056
Published: 27th October 2005
Format: Hardcover
Language: English
Number of Pages: 240
Audience: General Adult
Publisher: Springer Nature B.V.
Country of Publication: NL
Dimensions (cm): 23.5 x 15.88 x 1.91
Weight (kg): 0.52
Shipping
| Standard Shipping | Express Shipping | |
|---|---|---|
| Metro postcodes: | $9.99 | $14.95 |
| Regional postcodes: | $9.99 | $14.95 |
| Rural postcodes: | $9.99 | $14.95 |
How to return your order
At Booktopia, we offer hassle-free returns in accordance with our returns policy. If you wish to return an item, please get in touch with Booktopia Customer Care.
Additional postage charges may be applicable.
Defective items
If there is a problem with any of the items received for your order then the Booktopia Customer Care team is ready to assist you.
For more info please visit our Help Centre.
You Can Find This Book In

Defaming the Freedom of Religion or Belief
A Historical and Conceptual Analysis of the United Nations
Paperback
RRP $91.99
$83.75

Digital Assets in Enforcement and Insolvency
Securing Creditor Access and Protecting Customer Interests in the Crypto World
Paperback
RRP $99.99
$89.75
OFF





















