| Figures | p. v |
| Acknowledgments | p. vii |
| The fearful spheres of Pascal and Parmenides | p. 1 |
| Everything an economist needs to know about physics but was probably afraid to ask: The history of the energy concept | p. 11 |
| Energy before "energy" | p. 12 |
| Live force and dead force | p. 16 |
| The motive force of fire | p. 23 |
| The Laplacian Dream | p. 26 |
| Some mathematics of conservation principles | p. 30 |
| The "discovery" of the conservation of energy | p. 35 |
| What was discovered? | p. 50 |
| The energetics movement | p. 53 |
| Entropy: More heat than light | p. 59 |
| The awakening from the Laplacian Dream | p. 66 |
| The theory of relativity | p. 77 |
| Quantum mechanics | p. 82 |
| Who's afraid of the nonconservation of energy? | p. 90 |
| Body, motion, and value | p. 99 |
| The discovery of energy conservation rechauffe | p. 101 |
| Measurement, mammon, momentum, and man | p. 108 |
| Darwinian evolution as metaphor | p. 117 |
| Lineamentrics from Stevin to Whewell | p. 119 |
| Energy as metaphoric synthesis | p. 127 |
| Physics off the gold standard | p. 132 |
| Science and substance theories of value in political economy to 1870 | p. 139 |
| The metaphor of value | p. 140 |
| Aristotle discovers the economy | p. 144 |
| Two kinds of mercantilism | p. 147 |
| Physiocracy: More wheat than Zeit | p. 154 |
| Smith and Say: Cartesian crossroads | p. 163 |
| Ricardian vices | p. 171 |
| Karl Marx and the swan song of substance theories of value | p. 174 |
| The watershed | p. 185 |
| Entr'acte | p. 191 |
| Neoclassical economic theory: An irresistable field of force meets an immovable object | p. 193 |
| Classical political economy: Paradoxes of motion | p. 197 |
| Precursors without energy: Canard, Bentham, Cournot | p. 202 |
| Hermann Gossen and the transition to neoclassical economics | p. 210 |
| The marginalist revolution of the 1870s | p. 217 |
| The canonical neoclassical model | p. 222 |
| Some consequences of a field theory of value | p. 231 |
| The sciences were never at war? | p. 241 |
| Walras, Jevons, Menger | p. 254 |
| Marshall: More discreet than right | p. 262 |
| Neoclassical economics as a species of energetics | p. 265 |
| The syndetic stage? | p. 270 |
| The imperatives of proto-energetics | p. 271 |
| The corruption of the field metaphor, and the retrogression to substance theories of value: Neoclassical production theory | p. 276 |
| A dyybuk named production | p. 280 |
| Putting square pegs in round holes: Flirting with the conservation of matter | p. 286 |
| Getting more and more out of less and less: The neoclassical production metaphors | p. 293 |
| The spurious symmetry of neoclassical theories of production and consumption | p. 310 |
| The myth of the engineering production function | p. 327 |
| Abandoning the field | p. 332 |
| Every man his own capital theorist | p. 334 |
| Has there been any progress in the theory of value in the 20th century? | p. 350 |
| The ironies of physics envy | p. 354 |
| Is economics a science? | p. 356 |
| Rediscovering the field: Integrability and revealed preference | p. 358 |
| The integrability problem and the misunderstood conservation principles | p. 369 |
| The age of technique | p. 372 |
| Paul Samuelson, scientist | p. 378 |
| Why did neoclassical economics cease to seriously emulate modern physical theory? | p. 386 |
| Reprise: The underworld of social physics | p. 394 |
| Universal history is the story of different intonations given to a handful of metaphors | p. 396 |
| The mathematics of the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms | p. 402 |
| Notes | p. 404 |
| Bibliography | p. 414 |
| Index | p. 446 |
| Table of Contents provided by Syndetics. All Rights Reserved. |