+612 9045 4394
$7.95 Delivery per order to Australia and New Zealand
100% Australian owned
Over a hundred thousand in-stock titles ready to ship
Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court : The Defining Cases - Terry Eastland

Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court

The Defining Cases

By: Terry Eastland (Editor)

Paperback Published: 16th August 2000
ISBN: 9780847697113
Number Of Pages: 432

Share This Book:


or 4 easy payments of $25.24 with Learn more
Ships in 10 to 15 business days

Earn 202 Qantas Points
on this Book

In Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court, Terry Eastland brings together the Court's leading First Amendment cases, some 60 in all, starting with Schenck v. United States (1919) and ending with Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1998). Complete with a comprehensive introduction, pertinent indices and a useful bibliography, Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court offers the general and specialized reader alike a thorough treatment of the Court's understanding on the First Amendment's speech, press, assembly, and petition clauses.

Industry Reviews

A splendid textbook for any free speech class, or for that matter for any reader interested in free speech. The contemporaneous reactions from leading newspapers are an especially valuable and unusual feature.--Eugene Volokh, UCLA School of Law

Prefacep. ix
Acknowledgments and Creditsp. xi
Introductionp. xiii
Note to the Readerp. xxix
Schenck v. United States, 1919p. 1
Opinion: Holmes
Response: Harvard Law Review
Abrams v. United States, 1919p. 7
Opinions: Clarke, Holmes
Response: The New Republic
Gitlow v. New York, 1925p. 12
Opinions: Sanford, Holmes
Responses: New York Times, Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), The New Republic
Whitney v. California, 1927p. 20
Opinions: Sanford, Brandeis
Stromberg v. California, 1931p. 24
Opinion: Hughes
Response: The Nation
Near v. Minnesota, 1931p. 26
Opinions: Hughes, Butler
Responses: Minneapolis Tribune, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times
Grosjean v. American Press Co., 1936p. 32
Opinion: Sutherland
DeJonge v. Oregon, 1937p. 36
Opinion: Hughes
Herndon v. Lowry, 1937p. 39
Opinions: Roberts, Van Devanter
Lovell v. City of Griffin, 1938p. 45
Opinion: Hughes
Thornhill v. Alabama, 1940p. 47
Opinion: Murphy
Responses: New York Times, The Christian Century
Cox v. New Hampshire, 1941p. 51
Opinion: Hughes
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 1942p. 54
Opinion: Murphy
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 1943p. 56
Opinions: Jackson, Frankfurter
Responses: The Christian Century, Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), New York Times, The New Republic
Thomas v. Collins, 1945p. 65
Opinions: Rutledge, Jackson, Roberts
United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 1947p. 73
Opinions: Reed, Black, Douglas
Kovacs v. Cooper, 1949p. 79
Opinions: Reed, Frankfurther, Jackson, Black, Rutledge
Terminiello v. Chicago, 1949p. 88
Opinions: Douglas, Jackson
American Communications Assn. v. Douds, 1950p. 96
Opinion: Vinson
Feiner v. New York, 1951p. 102
Opinions: Vinson, Black, Douglas
Kunz v. New York, 1951p. 107
Opinions: Vinson, Jackson
Dennis v. United States, 1951p. 112
Opinions: Vinson, Frankfurter, Jackson, Black, Douglas
Responses: New York Times, The Nation, Washington Post
Beauharnais v. Illinois, 1952p. 123
Opinions: Frankfurther, Black, Reed, Douglas, Jackson
Burstyn v. Wilson, 1952p. 133
Opinion: Clark
Roth v. United States, 1957p. 137
Opinions: Brennan, Douglas
Response: The Commonweal
NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 1958p. 144
Opinion: Harlan
Response: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
Barenblatt v. United States, 1959p. 148
Opinions: Harlan, Black
Responses: Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), The New Republic
Edwards v. South Carolina, 1963p. 155
Opinion: Stewart
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 1964p. 158
Opinions: Brennan, Black
Responses: New York Times, The New Republic, Evening Star (Washington, D.C.)
Lamont v. Postmaster General, 1965p. 166
Opinions: Douglas, Brennan
United States v. Robel, 1967p. 168
Opinions: Warren, White
United States v. O'Brien, 1968p. 173
Opinion: Warren
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1969p. 178
Opinion: White
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 1969p. 185
Opinions: Fortas, Black
Responses: Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), New York Times
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969p. 192
Opinions: Per Curiam, Douglas
Cohen v. California, 1971p. 195
Opinions: Harlan, Blackmun
New York Times Co. v. United States, 1971p. 198
Opinions: Per Curiam, Black, Brennan, Stewart, White, Burger, Harlan
Responses: New York Times, Evening Star (Washington, D.C.)
Branzburg v. Hayes, 1972p. 209
Opinions: White, Powell, Stewart
Response: New York Times
Miller v. California, 1973, andp. 218
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 1973
Opinions: Miller, Burger, Douglas; Paris Adult Theatre, Burger, Brennan
Responses: Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Boston Herald American, Wall Street Journal
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 1974p. 235
Opinions: Burger, White
Buckley v. Valeo, 1976p. 240
Opinions: Per Curiam, Burger, White
Responses: Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times
Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Consumer Council, 1976p. 252
Opinions: Blackmun, Stewart, Rehnquist
Response: Wall Street Journal
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 1978p. 261
Opinions: White, Stewart
Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 1980p. 266
Opinions: Burger, Brennan, Rehnquist
New York v. Ferber, 1982p. 274
Opinion: White
Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 1984p. 279
Opinion: Brennan
Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 1986p. 284
Opinions: Rehnquist, Brennan
Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser, 1986p. 291
Opinions: Burger, Brennan
Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 1987p. 295
Opinion: O'Connor
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 1988p. 298
Opinion: Rehnquist
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 1988p. 302
Opinions: White, Brennan
Texas v. Johnson, 1989p. 308
Opinions: Brennan, Kennedy, Rehnquist
Responses: Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Indianapolis Star, George F. Will (syndicated column)
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 1990p. 318
Opinions: Rehnquist, Brennan
Rust v. Sullivan, 1991p. 323
Opinions: Rehnquist, Blackmun
Responses: America, The Progressive
R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 1992p. 331
Opinions: Scalia, White, Blackmun, Stevens
Responses: The Nation, The New Republic, Dallas Morning News
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay Group of Boston, 1995p. 345
Opinion: Souter
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 1996p. 350
Opinions: Stevens, Scalia, Thomas, O'Connor
Responses: New York Times, George F. Will (syndicated column)
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 1997p. 363
Opinions: Stevens, O'Connor
Responses: Washington Post, Oregonian
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 1998p. 373
Opinions: O'Connor, Scalia, Souter
Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1919-1999p. 381
Bibliographyp. 383
Index of Names and Topicsp. 385
Index of Casesp. 393
About the Editorp. 397
Table of Contents provided by Syndetics. All Rights Reserved.

ISBN: 9780847697113
ISBN-10: 0847697118
Audience: General
Format: Paperback
Language: English
Number Of Pages: 432
Published: 16th August 2000
Country of Publication: US
Dimensions (cm): 25.4 x 17.53  x 2.62
Weight (kg): 0.72

Earn 202 Qantas Points
on this Book