According to conventional wisdom, American social policy has always been exceptional--exceptionally stingy and backwards. But Edwin Amenta reminds us here that sixty years ago the United States led the world in spending on social provision. He combines history and political theory to account for this surprising fact--and to explain why the country's leading role was short-lived.
The orthodox view is that American social policy began in the 1930s as a two-track system of miserly "welfare" for the unemployed and generous "social security" for the elderly. However, Amenta shows that the New Deal was in fact a bold program of relief, committed to providing jobs and income support for the unemployed. Social security was, by comparison, a policy afterthought. By the late 1930s, he shows, the U.S. pledged more of its gross national product to relief programs than did any other major industrial country.
Amenta develops and uses an institutional politics theory to explain how social policy expansion was driven by northern Democrats, state-based reformers, and political outsiders. And he shows that retrenchment in the 1940s was led by politicians from areas where beneficiaries of relief were barred from voting. He also considers why some programs were nationalized, why some states had far-reaching "little New Deals," and why Britain--otherwise so similar to the United States--adopted more generous social programs. "Bold Relief" will transform our understanding of the roots of American social policy and of the institutional and political dynamics that will shape its future.
Co-Winner of the 1999 Distinguished Publication Award, Political Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association One of Choice's Outstanding Academic Titles for 1998 "In Bold Relief, Edwin Amenta brings welcome attention to the wide range of social services promulgated in the mid- and late 1930s... Bold Relief offers a useful and insightful overview of the origin and limits to US social policy."--Political Science Quarterly "With convincing evidence, Bold Relief limns a bold new vision of federal social policy from the New Deal through the 1940s."--Reviews in American History "Amenta insists that [social insurance and assistance programs] were constructed around the public provision of work for those in need... The argument is impressive, and it offers a political reminder that providing work was, for a time, thought a legitimate and desirable role for governments."--The Times Higher Education Supplement "Bold Relief restores an important dimension to the history of American social policy... One hopes that the book will inspire advocates of all kinds of policy to be bolder--and better informed--about creating the political and administrative preconditions necessary for new social policies."--Social Service Reviews
|List of Illustrations|
|List of Tables and Figures|
|Introduction: Paradoxes of American Social Policy||p. 3|
|An Institutional Politics Theory of Social Policy||p. 18|
|An Indifferent Commitment to Modern Social Policy, 1880-1934||p. 54|
|America's First Welfare Reform, 1935-1936||p. 80|
|Consolidating the Work and Relief Policy, 1937-1939||p. 122|
|Some Little New Deals Are Littler than Others||p. 162|
|Redefining the New Deal, 1940-1950||p. 191|
|A Welfare State for Britain||p. 231|
|Initials of Organizations and Programs||p. 331|
|Sources of Illustrations||p. 333|
|Table of Contents provided by Syndetics. All Rights Reserved.|
Series: Princeton Studies in American Politics: Historical, International, and Comparative P... (Paperback)
Audience: Tertiary; University or College
Number Of Pages: 320
Published: 1st March 2000
Country of Publication: US
Dimensions (cm): 22.91 x 15.19 x 2.06
Weight (kg): 0.53