Roman Litigation has long been a difficult subject for study, hampered by a lack of information concerning the practical operation of the civil courts. Using newly discovered evidence, the author of this new book presents a lucid new interpretation of how civil trials in classical Rome were commenced and brought to judgement. The new evidence adds enormously to our knowledge of Roman courts, and the author uses this evidence to create what is a valuable and original contribution to the literature on Roman Civil procedure.
`lucidly presented, but of a technical legal nature For the specialist, it is something of a landmark.'
The Classical Outlook, Vol. 77, No. 2, Winter 2000
`a painstaking review of our assumptions about Roman civil procedure ... a closely argued, technical book. It is a 'must' for anyone interested in Roman law procedure or the lex Irnitana.'
Andrew Lintott, Journal of Roman Studies, LXXXIX 1999
Part I: Appointment
1. A New Procedural Institution
2. Granting a Trial for the Third Day
3. A Divided Proceeding in iure
4. The Appointment of the Judge
5. Intertium and Comperendinu Dies
Part II: Adjournment and Judgement
6. Diem Diffindere
7. Dividing the Fictional Day
8. The One-day rule
9. The Meaning of 'Divide'
10. Antinoopolis Papyrus I. 22
11. The Judge's Burden
Number Of Pages: 184
Published: 1st July 1997
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Country of Publication: GB
Dimensions (cm): 24.2 x 16.2
Weight (kg): 0.42