1300 187 187
 

Patent Application Drafting

A Practical Guide

Paperback

Published: 29th June 2012
Ships: 7 to 10 business days
RRP $379.99
$341.95
10%
OFF

The proper drafting of a patent application takes into account technical breadth, legal strategy, conformance with a vast number of rules and regulations codified in U.S. statutory law, guidelines issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and over a hundred years of constantly evolving case law. Present texts on the drafting of U.S. patent applications generally fall into two categories: First are the weighty legal treatises that focus on theory and case law to the detriment of practical information; second are the "patent it yourself" books, which are very basic and limited in scope, and thus not of much use to a practicing patent attorney or patent agent.

Patent Application Drafting: A Practical Guide actually teaches the drafting of patent applications from a practical perspective. Intended as an introductory text, it covers the entire patent application and includes many helpful examples illustrating the process from start to finish. It is written for novice patent attorneys, agents, law students, and for those preparing for the patent bar exam.

This particular work on patent application drafting is - and does - what it says on the cover. It is indeed a practical no-nonsense guide to the entire patent application process from start to finish, including many helpful illustrative examples - complete with diagrams - of the kind that the typical patent lawyer will usually encounter in practice. Phillip Taylor MBE and Elizabeth Taylor of Richmond Green Chambers

Forewordp. xiii
Prefacep. xvii
Introductionp. xix
Claims Part 1: Basic Elements of a Claimp. 1
Claim Structurep. 1
Introductionp. 1
Examplep. 2
The Class and Preamblep. 5
Transitional Phrasesp. 8
The Claim Bodyp. 9
The Purpose Clausep. 10
Essential Formp. 11
Claim Fundamentalsp. 11
Single Statutory Classificationp. 11
Completenessp. 13
Definitenessp. 14
Dependent Claimsp. 18
Claims Part 2: Types of Inventions and Types of Claimsp. 23
Apparatus Claimsp. 23
Method Claimsp. 24
Product-by-Process Claimsp. 24
Means-Plus-Function Claimsp. 50
Markush Claimsp. 51
Jepson Claimsp. 80
Software and Beauregard Claimsp. 87
Chemical Claimsp. 143
Pharmaceutical Claimsp. 143
Business Methods Claimsp. 151
Claims Part 3: Claim Constructionp. 169
Choosing Essential Elementsp. 169
Broad vs. Narrow Claimingp. 169
Apparatus Claimsp. 170
Method Claimsp. 181
Choice of Languagep. 181
Punctuationp. 183
Plural Elementsp. 184
Ranges and Measurementsp. 185
Brevityp. 185
The Summary of the Invention and the Abstractp. 187
The Summary of the Inventionp. 187
The Abstractp. 191
The Specificationp. 193
Titlep. 193
Priority Claimsp. 194
Background of the Inventionp. 196
Field of the Inventionp. 196
Description of the Related Artp. 197
Brief Description of the Drawingsp. 198
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodimentsp. 199
Languagep. 203
Incorporation by Referencep. 205
Sequence Listingsp. 206
Deposit of Biological Materialp. 207
Best Mode Requirementp. 208
Enablementp. 209
Miscellaneous Considerationsp. 210
Information Disclosure Statementp. 213
The Drawingsp. 215
35 U.S.C. § 101: Utility and Patentable Subject Matterp. 235
Patentable Inventionsp. 235
General Utility Requirementp. 236
Mental Stepsp. 237
Printed Matterp. 238
Products of Naturep. 238
35 U.S.C. §112: Enablement, Form, and Languagep. 239
First Paragraphp. 239
Written Descriptionp. 240
Enablement, Inoperability, and Best Modep. 241
Second Paragraphp. 242
Articles of Speechp. 243
Alternative Languagep. 243
Negative Limitationsp. 243
Relative Languagep. 244
Sixth Paragraph: Means-for Languagep. 244
35 U.S.C. §102 and §103: Considering Prior Artp. 247
A More Complex Example with Prior Art Considerationsp. 258
Client's Original Disclosurep. 260
Prior Art Search and Analysisp. 260
The Essential Elements and the Point of Noveltyp. 260
Sketchesp. 273
Claimsp. 279
Summaryp. 282
Abstractp. 283
Specificationp. 283
Finalized Drawingsp. 292
Issued Patentp. 298
Prosecution using the Complex Examplep. 309
Office Actionp. 310
Examiner's Cited Prior Artp. 322
Interviewp. 380
Amendmentp. 383
Notice of Allowancep. 393
Algorithms, Business Methods, Computers, and Softwarep. 399
Introductionp. 399
Overviewp. 400
The Supreme Court Trilogyp. 403
Bilski v. Kapposp. 405
Background of Bilskip. 406
The CAFC Decisionp. 408
Conclusionp. 409
Patent Office Guidelines and the Post-Bilski Aftermathp. 410
Post-Bilski Case Lawp. 411
USPTO Guidelinesp. 412
Latest Application of Bilskip. 415
Claimingp. 417
The Specificationp. 422
Further Examples of Different Classes and Types of Applicationsp. 425
Apparatusp. 426
Method/Processp. 443
Product-by-Processp. 463
Improvement with Jepson Claimsp. 471
Computers, Algorithms, Software, and Business Methodsp. 479
Chemicalp. 507
Pharmaceutical and Treatment Methodsp. 516
Strategy and Enforcementp. 551
The Doctrine of Claim Differentiationp. 551
The Usage of Dependent Claimsp. 553
Target Claimingp. 554
Realistic Enforcementp. 554
Design Patent Applicationsp. 557
Appendices
Example of Complete Application and Forms for Filingp. 563
Claim Drafting Checklistp. 603
Glossaryp. 605
USPTO Interim Examination Instructions (August 24, 2009)p. 613
USPTO Interim Business Method Training Material (August 2009)p. 625
USPTO Guidelines for Business Methods (July 27, 2010)p. 635
35 U.S.C. §101-Practical Tipsp. 636
Update on Business Method Patents and Best Practices to Streamline Examinationp. 650
More on Business Methodsp. 667
Bibliographyp. 671
Indexp. 673
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.

ISBN: 9780199927258
ISBN-10: 0199927251
Audience: Professional
Format: Paperback
Language: English
Number Of Pages: 664
Published: 29th June 2012
Dimensions (cm): 24.0 x 17.0  x 3.7
Weight (kg): 1.018